The gate hinge has been replaced and completion evidence submitted. A human inspector must decide. The 90% payment is still held; no acceptance has been given.
Community garden, main gate WO-GATE-006-0001 contractor-b….testnet
Fixture fallback. The live API has no case record for this id; the frozen replay fixture is shown instead. No live transaction, attestation or physical verification is claimed.
Current state · plain language
Completion evidence is submitted and awaiting independent human review. Payment is still held.
Next: A rostered inspector — never the contractor — accepts or rejects completion.
Updated 10 Nov 2026 · 12:20 UTC
Money at a glance
100.00 USDC
Funded in mend-usdc.testnet
Refunded
20.00 USDC
Still escrowed
80.00 USDC
Completion paid
0.00 USDC
Holdback held
0.00 USDC
Holdback released
0.00 USDC
Approved scope
What the contractor is allowed to do
Scope, budget, roster and scoring policy were authorized together. AI may propose; it cannot approve.
DAO #47 · APPROVED
Replace the failed gate hinge and re-fix the top bracket. Check the gate swings freely and latches without lifting. Submit before, during, after, close-up, materials and site-clean evidence.
Scope hash8f4a2c6e…6d4f1a
Scoring policy hash1a8a9858…42357d
Maximum budget
100.00 USDC
Awarded bid
80.00 USDC
Contractor roster
3 approved accounts
Inspector roster
2 approved accounts
DAO authorization is a push path: a Sputnik FunctionCall proposal executes dao_authorize only after approval. MEND does not trust proposal text. This replay reference is not a live proposal lookup.
Full timeline
Every state, actor and evidence reference
No unexplained “processing” state. Each entry names the actor and the decision that moved the case.
5 events
Report
Report received without a wallet
EXIF and GPS removed in the browser before upload.
anonymous reporter
Authorization
Steward scope and DAO envelope approved
Proposal #47 authorizes the market and inspection roster.
steward.mend.testnet + mend-dao.sputnikv2.testnet
Funding
Sponsor funded 100 test USDC
Exact funding reconciled to this work order.
sponsor.mend.testnet
Award
Award confirmed after deterministic scoring
Contractor B awarded at 80 USDC; 20 USDC returned to the sponsor.
steward.mend.testnet
Evidence
Completion evidence submitted — human review pending
Five checklist items complete. The site-clean photo is missing. No payment has been released.
contractor-b.mend.testnet
Completion evidence629d602928…40fb88
Payment rail
Every cent accounted for
Ledger balanced · 100.00 = 100.00
Sponsor budget
100.00 USDC
Funded into escrow
Unawarded refund
20.00 USDC
Refunded or still available
Completion payment
0.00 USDC
80.00 USDC still held in escrow
Durability holdback
0.00 USDC
10% released after durability pass
Payment history
mend-usdc.testnet
Payments recorded for WO-GATE-006-0001
Kind
Amount
Recipient
Status
Recorded
refund
20.00 USDC
sponsor.mend.testnet
SUCCESS
10 Nov 2026 · 09:25 UTC
A completion payment and holdback are calculated exactly once. A closed work order cannot be paid again. A warranty reopening creates no new escrow.
No payment above carries a real transaction hash in this replay fixture, so no explorer link is shown.
Work order stateCompletion submitted
Evidence packages
Private media, public hashes
On-chain state references redacted hashes only. Raw media and precise location stay off-chain.
1 package
EV-0003 · completion evidence
contractor-b.mend.testnet · 10 Nov 2026 · 12:20 UTC
Redacted
Before photo of the damaged asset
Repair or replacement in progress
After photo from the same angle
Close-up of the repaired joint or fixing
Materials or fixings receipt / label
—Site left clean and safeNo photo supplied. This is why acceptance is on hold.
Evidence hash 1629d6029…40fb88
Evidence hash 2eeeeeeee…eeeeee
Evidence hash 3ffffffff…ffffff
A completeness review can identify missing checklist items. It cannot certify physical quality and it never supplies the human acceptance decision.
Verification ledger
What is verified, what is unavailable, and what is a human claim
REPLAY RECORDING
Verified inference evidence
Cryptographically checked inference, execution or transaction evidence.
Unavailable evidence
Expected evidence that was not available, not bundled or not verified. Never shown as verified.
Human decision
A named human decision. A human signed or explicitly confirmed it; AI did not.
Physical claim
A claim about the physical world. It is not machine-certified and does not imply structural safety.
Private AI triage
NEAR AI Cloud · structured output only
Unavailable evidence
Structured classification, duplicate candidate and scope recommendation were generated in a private inference session. Raw media never reaches the chain.
Replay recording. No live NEAR AI response signature is bundled, so this artifact is shown as unavailable rather than verified.
AI proposes classification, duplicate candidates and scope. It cannot approve scope, award a bid or move money.
OutLayer deterministic execution
Hash-pinned WASM · no LLM ranking
Unavailable evidence
Policy, WASM, input and output hashes are displayed below. The contract would accept only a hash-bound callback from the configured OutLayer account.
Policy hash1a8a9858…42357d
WASM hash790f3eb4…a3ef42
Input hashf44bd67a…35e947
Output hash792aba5f…71304d
Replay recording. The deterministic ranking can be reproduced from the frozen bids, but no live OutLayer callback is claimed.
A live result would be accepted only through the configured OutLayer callback and matching policy, WASM, input and output hashes.
Human decisions
Steward · inspector · DAO
Human decision
mend-dao.sputnikv2.testnet approved proposal #4710 Nov 2026 · 08:30 UTC
Replay recording. Human actors are labelled, but their wallet signatures are not part of this fixture bundle.
A named decision is not the same as a cryptographic signature. Replay fixtures label human actors but do not bundle their wallet signatures.
Physical-world claims
Contractor evidence · inspector observation
Physical claim
No physical observation is recorded yet. Completion evidence is a contractor claim until a human inspector reviews it.
MEND does not certify structural, electrical or gas safety. Physical claims remain the responsibility of the named contractor and human inspector.