REPLAY / SIMULATION

Frozen protocol fixtures. No live transaction, AI attestation or physical verification is claimed.

Mode & demo role
Warranty reopenedREPLAY / SIMULATION · FIXTURE FALLBACK1 report

Community centre bicycle rack — failed durability

The first repair passed completion review but failed its later durability inspection. The original work order reopened as a warranty case: no new bounty, no new funds, and the failure stays in the asset history.

Community Centre, north entrance WO-RACK-002-0001 contractor-b….testnet

Fixture fallback. The live API has no case record for this id; the frozen replay fixture is shown instead. No live transaction, attestation or physical verification is claimed.

Current state · plain language

A durability inspection failed. The same work order reopened with no new escrow, no new bounty and the failure preserved.

Next: Remediation evidence must be accepted, then a later durability inspection must pass before the holdback releases.

Updated 10 Nov 2026 · 14:20 UTC

Money at a glance

100.00 USDC

Funded in mend-usdc.testnet

Refunded
20.00 USDC
Completion paid
72.00 USDC
Holdback held
8.00 USDC
Holdback released
0.00 USDC

Approved scope

What the contractor is allowed to do

Scope, budget, roster and scoring policy were authorized together. AI may propose; it cannot approve.

DAO #43 · APPROVED

Straighten or replace the bicycle-rack support arm. Re-seat and torque the anchor plate. Treat corrosion, verify stability under load and submit the six-item redacted evidence checklist.

Scope hash9e18b0e9…90d1ea
Scoring policy hash1a8a9858…42357d
Maximum budget
100.00 USDC
Awarded bid
80.00 USDC
Contractor roster
3 approved accounts
Inspector roster
2 approved accounts
DAO authorization is a push path: a Sputnik FunctionCall proposal executes dao_authorize only after approval. MEND does not trust proposal text. This replay reference is not a live proposal lookup.

Full timeline

Every state, actor and evidence reference

No unexplained “processing” state. Each entry names the actor and the decision that moved the case.

10 events
  1. Report

    Report received without a wallet

    Photo and description submitted with EXIF/GPS removed in the browser.

    anonymous reporter · case_7J2mQ9xLk4Pz1VbN

    • Redacted media hasheeeeeeeeee…eeeeee
  2. Authorization

    Steward scope and DAO envelope approved

    Proposal #43 authorizes roster, budget and the versioned scoring policy.

    steward.mend.testnet + mend-dao.sputnikv2.testnet

    • Scope hash9e18b0e953…90d1ea
  3. Funding

    Sponsor funded 100 test USDC

    Test value only. Funding is reconciled to this work order.

    sponsor.mend.testnet

  4. Deterministic score

    Sealed bids revealed and scored

    Same deterministic policy as the bench case. Contractor B ranked first.

    3 rostered contractors

    • Output hash792aba5f6d…71304d
  5. Award

    Award confirmed

    80 USDC locked; 20 USDC returned to the sponsor.

    steward.mend.testnet

  6. Evidence

    Completion evidence submitted

    First repair evidence package. The inspector accepted it after a physical check.

    contractor-b.mend.testnet

    • Evidence hash629d602928…40fb88
  7. Inspection

    Completion accepted; 72 USDC paid

    The 8 USDC durability holdback remains in escrow.

    inspector.mend.testnet

    • Human acceptanceinspector.mend.testnet
  8. Warranty

    Durability inspection rejected — warranty reopened

    The rack arm moved under load. The same work order reopened; no new bounty, no new fund and no erasure of the failure.

    inspector.mend.testnet

    • Human durability rejectioninspector.mend.testnet
    • Physical observationSupport arm deflected under light load
  9. Evidence

    Remediation evidence submitted

    Contractor replaced the anchor fixing. A different inspector reviewed the remediation.

    contractor-b.mend.testnet

    • Remediation evidence938e176bb8…c04f0c
    • Inspectorinspector-2.mend.testnet
  10. Inspection

    Remediation accepted; durability re-check pending

    Remediation acceptance pays nothing. The holdback stays held until a later durability pass.

    inspector-2.mend.testnet

    • Human acceptanceinspector-2.mend.testnet

Payment rail

Every cent accounted for

Ledger balanced · 100.00 = 100.00

Sponsor budget

100.00 USDC

Funded into escrow

Unawarded refund

20.00 USDC

Refunded or still available

Completion payment

72.00 USDC

90% after independent acceptance

Durability holdback

8.00 USDC

8.00 USDC still held

Payment history

mend-usdc.testnet
Payments recorded for WO-RACK-002-0001
KindAmountRecipientStatusRecorded
refund20.00 USDCsponsor.mend.testnetSUCCESS10 Nov 2026 · 09:25 UTC
completion72.00 USDCcontractor-b.mend.testnetSUCCESS10 Nov 2026 · 11:30 UTC
holdback8.00 USDCcontractor-b.mend.testnetPENDINGNot released

A completion payment and holdback are calculated exactly once. A closed work order cannot be paid again. A warranty reopening creates no new escrow.

Open sponsor & Intents view

No payment above carries a real transaction hash in this replay fixture, so no explorer link is shown.

Work order stateWarranty reopened

Evidence packages

Private media, public hashes

On-chain state references redacted hashes only. Raw media and precise location stay off-chain.

2 packages

EV-0001 · completion evidence

contractor-b.mend.testnet · 10 Nov 2026 · 11:00 UTC

Redacted
  • Before photo of the damaged asset
  • Repair or replacement in progress
  • After photo from the same angle
  • Close-up of the repaired joint or fixing
  • Materials or fixings receipt / label
  • Site left clean and safeContractor says sweep completed; no photo supplied.
Evidence hash 1629d6029…40fb88
Evidence hash 2dddddddd…dddddd
Evidence hash 3eeeeeeee…eeeeee

EV-0002 · remediation evidence

contractor-b.mend.testnet · 10 Nov 2026 · 14:05 UTC

Redacted
  • Original failure photographed
  • Replacement fixing installed
  • After photo from the same angle
  • Close-up of the repaired fixing
  • Materials or fixings receipt / label
  • Independent re-inspection requested
Evidence hash 1938e176b…c04f0c
Evidence hash 2ffffffff…ffffff
A completeness review can identify missing checklist items. It cannot certify physical quality and it never supplies the human acceptance decision.

Verification ledger

What is verified, what is unavailable, and what is a human claim

REPLAY RECORDING
Verified inference evidence

Cryptographically checked inference, execution or transaction evidence.

Unavailable evidence

Expected evidence that was not available, not bundled or not verified. Never shown as verified.

Human decision

A named human decision. A human signed or explicitly confirmed it; AI did not.

Physical claim

A claim about the physical world. It is not machine-certified and does not imply structural safety.

Private AI triage

NEAR AI Cloud · structured output only

Unavailable evidence

Structured classification, duplicate candidate and scope recommendation were generated in a private inference session. Raw media never reaches the chain.

Replay recording. No live NEAR AI response signature is bundled, so this artifact is shown as unavailable rather than verified.

AI proposes classification, duplicate candidates and scope. It cannot approve scope, award a bid or move money.

OutLayer deterministic execution

Hash-pinned WASM · no LLM ranking

Unavailable evidence

Policy, WASM, input and output hashes are displayed below. The contract would accept only a hash-bound callback from the configured OutLayer account.

Policy hash1a8a9858…42357d
WASM hash790f3eb4…a3ef42
Input hashf44bd67a…35e947
Output hash792aba5f…71304d

Replay recording. The deterministic ranking can be reproduced from the frozen bids, but no live OutLayer callback is claimed.

A live result would be accepted only through the configured OutLayer callback and matching policy, WASM, input and output hashes.

Human decisions

Steward · inspector · DAO

Human decision
  • inspector.mend.testnet approved completion inspection10 Nov 2026 · 11:30 UTC
  • inspector.mend.testnet rejected durability inspection10 Nov 2026 · 13:35 UTC
  • inspector-2.mend.testnet approved remediation inspection10 Nov 2026 · 14:20 UTC
  • mend-dao.sputnikv2.testnet approved proposal #4310 Nov 2026 · 08:30 UTC

Replay recording. Human actors are labelled, but their wallet signatures are not part of this fixture bundle.

A named decision is not the same as a cryptographic signature. Replay fixtures label human actors but do not bundle their wallet signatures.

Physical-world claims

Contractor evidence · inspector observation

Physical claim
  • Support arm deflected under light load10 Nov 2026 · 13:35 UTC · observed claim, not machine-certified

MEND does not certify structural, electrical or gas safety. Physical claims remain the responsibility of the named contractor and human inspector.