Inspector console
Evidence review, human decision.
AI can identify missing checklist items. It cannot accept the work, sign an inspection or certify physical quality. Those controls belong to a rostered human inspector who is not the contractor.
Assignment
WO-FENCE-004-0001
Allotment boundary fence — funded, awaiting bids
REPLAY / SIMULATION · FIXTURE FALLBACK
- Inspector
- Not assigned
- Contractor
- Not awarded
- Held in escrow
- 45.00 USDC
- Bid commitments
- 0
- Bid reveals
- 0
- Evidence packages
- 0
- Decision
- No pending review
Separation of duties failed: the inspector must not be the contractor.
Evidence package
No evidence package
Nothing has been submitted for review.
No completion evidence has been submitted for this work order.
Completeness assistant
Suggestions, never a decision
The reviewer agent compares redacted evidence with the approved checklist. It returns missing items; it does not certify physical quality.
Optional: second angle of the repaired fixingA second angle can make the redacted evidence easier to review. This is a completeness suggestion, not a quality judgement.
Human-only: physical conditionThe assistant cannot certify that the repair is safe, durable or complete. That decision belongs to the rostered human inspector.
No acceptance authority
There is no “AI approve” control. The reviewer assistant cannot click, sign or imply final acceptance. Its output is a proposal for a human to read.
Human-only control
Record the inspector decision
No valid pending decision
The work order is in FUNDED, which does not accept a completion decision. The controls are disabled rather than pretending the transition is valid.
Notes are hashed in the live flow. This public replay does not store or transmit them.
REPLAY / SIMULATION. The live API has no case record for this id; the frozen replay fixture is shown instead.